Fractal Talk

Seems they tried REALLY hard to get spring into the FM3. Wondering if the CPU reduction in this FW is related. I was able to up all the reverbs up to high quality in my patches for this one.

-Aaron
 
Stone said:
I wonder how Much CPU with one amp + Cab + Spring reverb would use up ?
would not this be the Trad setup and the way to use a Spring Reverb ? I mean i really doubt that i or anyone would use a Spring Reverb in say an EVH or John Petrucci chain or other complex chains
Im pretty sur that would satisfy all of those Jones'ing for the new Spring Reverb, OFC can't please everyone

:idk
Click to expand...
The trad setup would be reverb -> amp -> cab.
But since there's not tremolo in the amp block on the FM3 the true trad setup would be:
reverb -> trem -> amp -> cab
But then you think about how many traditional players used this trad setup with an magnetic slap delay in front, so the trad setup becomes:
delay -> verb -> trem -> amp -> cab
And you start to realize that this trad sound is even better when you can add the console and/or tape saturation that was also kind of part-and-parcel to those vintage sounds...

The simple preset quickly grows VERY CPU hungry.
 
Boudoir Guitar said:
The trad setup would be reverb -> amp -> cab.
But since there's not tremolo in the amp block on the FM3 the true trad setup would be:
reverb -> trem -> amp -> cab
But then you think about how many traditional players used this trad setup with an magnetic slap delay in front, so the trad setup becomes:
delay -> verb -> trem -> amp -> cab
And you start to realize that this trad sound is even better when you can add the console and/or tape saturation that was also kind of part-and-parcel to those vintage sounds...

The simple preset quickly grows VERY CPU hungry.
Click to expand...
Sure, but you can walk into the same argument using half the algorithms already in the FM3. With longer chains, I hit DSP warnings/ failures all the time - especially if I take reverb out of economy mode. (And I’ve never thought to call customer support about it, since the cause of failure is right there on the screen.)

As for the specific chain you’re describing here, this assumes everything in the box, direct to FR. Plenty of people would instead use half that chain straight to a guitar cab, which would work fine. I just don’t see how this particular effect should warrant a special “policy”.
 
Boudoir Guitar said:
I agree more is better. I don’t think it’s currently massively too few and I don’t find hyperbole to describe current situation is all that helpful.

.I don't want to have to use both page AND arrow buttons to navigate between things that don't seem to be different enough to warrant moving to the "page" button. Has there ever been talk about the left/right arrows moving between individual parameters on a page, but also turning the page when the last parameter is reached?
Click to expand...
I think this will result in unexpected functionality if pages change when reaching the last parameter. In practice it might cause more frustration than it solves.

Boudoir Guitar said:
A lot of this boils down to the usual complaint of "it seems like things that should be capable of being done with one button press always require 2, which isn't a big thing once, but after 1.5 hours of use, it...starts to grate a little".
Click to expand...
That's pretty much it. A lot of button presses to get to places, a lot of different views that take that extra moment to reorient yourself and find the cursor etc.
Boudoir Guitar said:
But a lot of it also comes down to "if I spent as much time yelling at clouds about how I wish the thing worked actually learning how the thing worked and ingraining that workflow in my brain...I might be just fine". For example, having individual direct-access buttons would be awesome, but while writing this post it occurred to me that I could get myself in the habit of using the "edit" button to move through blocks in edit mode to fairly efficiently get to the delay and reverb pages by hitting the "cab" knob and then hitting "edit" a couple times...
Click to expand...
Every Fractal owner who uses the front panel eventually does it like this and you get reasonably quick at it. But it feels like a real chore even compared to say a Helix where you just tap a capacitive switch to get to the block you want from anywhere as long as said block bypass is mapped.

It would actually be cool to have functions for FC controllers that can just control the UI itself, like a footswitch to bring up the Performance view, or editing view of a particular block, move to next block etc. Then you could drive the UI with your feet and keep your hands on the under screen knobs!
 
mbenigni said:
Sure, but you can walk into the same argument using half the algorithms already in the FM3. With longer chains, I hit DSP warnings/ failures all the time - especially if I take reverb out of economy mode. (And I’ve never thought to call customer support about it, since the cause of failure is right there on the screen.)

As for the specific chain you’re describing here, this assumes everything in the box, direct to FR. Plenty of people would instead use half that chain straight to a guitar cab, which would work fine. I just don’t see how this particular effect should warrant a special “policy”.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'd totally rather have the frustration of hitting DSP limit before I got to the ideal, was just a note that "even 'simple' signal chains can eat up a loooooot of DSP" :beer
 
laxu said:
I think this will result in unexpected functionality if pages change when reaching the last parameter. In practice it might cause more frustration than it solves.


That's pretty much it. A lot of button presses to get to places, a lot of different views that take that extra moment to reorient yourself and find the cursor etc.

Every Fractal owner who uses the front panel eventually does it like this and you get reasonably quick at it. But it feels like a real chore even compared to say a Helix where you just tap a capacitive switch to get to the block you want from anywhere as long as said block bypass is mapped.

It would actually be cool to have functions for FC controllers that can just control the UI itself, like a footswitch to bring up the Performance view, or editing view of a particular block, move to next block etc. Then you could drive the UI with your feet and keep your hands on the under screen knobs!
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that the "frustration" of having to use the edit button to scroll through blocks would be much worse than the "frustration" of having to up/down arrow through 6+ rows of parameters on a performance page. At the end of the day, I will always be a proponent for knob-tweak ability, but am also fully aware that regardless of the UI, the experience is always better when I get real about what parameters I REALLY need to have direct-knob access to and which I can do a little bit of button pushing to get to.

The using FC to do UI was something I was thinking about.

Personally...in desktop mode, I find Helix's capacitive foot switches to be better in theory than in practice. Too many instances of reaching to turn a knob and the bottom of my forearm brushes across a switch and then I've completely altered a patch in ways I didn't mean to, etc. And...I ain't taking my socks off to keep control on the floor and use it to navigate the signal path.
 
Well, just like the Stomp vs. full size HX gear, if you want that full blown capability; you have to buy one of the bigger boxes. It's honestly a big enough piece as is that it isn't like it is actually ever in the running for the micro-my-rig-into-one-trip-award. Unless you are wanting to keep it in the family and downsize from the III? If you aren't wanting to put that full quality verb in your chain; you can pack a LOT into one preset. And now with gapless; it seems kind of a moot point. Unless you have to do things the hard way
House Party Dancing GIF by Amazon Prime Video
 
Boudoir Guitar said:
I'm not sure that the "frustration" of having to use the edit button to scroll through blocks would be much worse than the "frustration" of having to up/down arrow through 6+ rows of parameters on a performance page. At the end of the day, I will always be a proponent for knob-tweak ability, but am also fully aware that regardless of the UI, the experience is always better when I get real about what parameters I REALLY need to have direct-knob access to and which I can do a little bit of button pushing to get to.
Click to expand...
It's the back and forth that annoys me more usually. Switching rows is not so bad because it doesn't change to a whole different view, you can see the other thing you just tweaked and so on.

Boudoir Guitar said:
Personally...in desktop mode, I find Helix's capacitive foot switches to be better in theory than in practice. Too many instances of reaching to turn a knob and the bottom of my forearm brushes across a switch and then I've completely altered a patch in ways I didn't mean to, etc. And...I ain't taking my socks off to keep control on the floor and use it to navigate the signal path.
Click to expand...
That's why the Helix Floor never worked for me as a desktop box. Too large, too much reaching over the footswitches.
 
JT said:
Well, just like the Stomp vs. full size HX gear, if you want that full blown capability; you have to buy one of the bigger boxes. It's honestly a big enough piece as is that it isn't like it is actually ever in the running for the micro-my-rig-into-one-trip-award. Unless you are wanting to keep it in the family and downsize from the III? If you aren't wanting to put that full quality verb in your chain; you can pack a LOT into one preset. And now with gapless; it seems kind of a moot point. Unless you have to do things the hard way
House Party Dancing GIF by Amazon Prime Video
Click to expand...
The FM3 market, imo, has always been 80% people like me; 20% people like @la szum

I am a cheap bastard that wanted Fractal performance on an Atomic budget and spend my time complaining about the fact that I have "yeah, but he's adopted" Fractal performance.

The other group are folks that actually got it as a full blown, all-in-one device that is about as small as an actual full-blown, all in one performance device reasonably needs to be and get on with using it that way and only complain about the people complaining about the genetic differences that they knew existed when they bought the thing.

:beer :guiness
 
Last edited:
Boudoir Guitar said:
The trad setup would be reverb -> amp -> cab.
But since there's not tremolo in the amp block on the FM3 the true trad setup would be:
reverb -> trem -> amp -> cab
But then you think about how many traditional players used this trad setup with an magnetic slap delay in front, so the trad setup becomes:
delay -> verb -> trem -> amp -> cab
And you start to realize that this trad sound is even better when you can add the console and/or tape saturation that was also kind of part-and-parcel to those vintage sounds...

The simple preset quickly grows VERY CPU hungry.
Click to expand...

Exactly!

My presets are "simple". But then I discovered the mastering section in the cab block, e.g. Mic pres with Tape / FET drive and saturation which used to add 10% or more to the CPU in the OG FM3. It was at that point that I wanted more and ordered an FM9.

My presets are still super simple (drive, hi quality reverb, delay, amp, cab; maybe comp or tremelo), but I consider the mic pre essential now.
 
JiveTurkey said:
This is the scene from last night. Somehow the audience refrained from a good ol' fashioned rotten tomato throw because of the FM3's crippled signal chain :cry: #humblebrag #they'renottheretoseeusbutI'lltakeit #howcan3switchesbeenough
View attachment 22150
Click to expand...
They may not be there to see you -- but it seems like maybe the last big-opener you guys did may have made enough of an impression for people to realize it was worth getting there in time. A huge congrats, but realize all I got is three buttons, so appreciate that it may be long and drawn out hold-for-layout-up-functionality to get to the size of congrats I am sending :beer :beer :beer
















:beer:beer:beer
















:beer:beer:beer
 
jellodog said:
Exactly!

My presets are "simple". But then I discovered the mastering section in the cab block, e.g. Mic pres with Tape / FET drive and saturation which used to add 10% or more to the CPU in the OG FM3. It was at that point that I wanted more and ordered an FM9.

My presets are still super simple (drive, hi quality reverb, delay, amp, cab; maybe comp or tremelo), but I consider the mic pre essential now.
Click to expand...
I'm leaning hard towards snagging a III (maaaaaybe FM9) again. Ideally, I would have:

ringmod -> drive 1 -> drive 2 -> delay -> reverb 1 -> tremolo -> amp -> cab -> rotary -> reverb 2

I can pull all of this off using the FM3, but don't have the new springs, and do need to split it up amongst a couple presets and...

...I really should just snag a III...
 
Boudoir Guitar said:
I'm leaning hard towards snagging a III (maaaaaybe FM9) again. Ideally, I would have:

ringmod -> drive 1 -> drive 2 -> delay -> reverb 1 -> tremolo -> amp -> cab -> rotary -> reverb 2

I can pull all of this off using the FM3, but don't have the new springs, and do need to split it up amongst a couple presets and...

...I really should just snag a III...
Click to expand...
You have a 3u slot in that desk I am betting. Use it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jellodog
Fender Tone Master Pro: Episode IV - A New Hope
50 51 52
Replies
1K
Views
62K
timbuck3
timbuck3
Will Chen
The Digitech RP500 has a special place in my heart.
Replies
16
Views
865
JCW308
JCW308
TubeStack
NMD: Line 6 Helix Floor
4 5 6
Replies
117
Views
6K
ragingplatypi
R
Iron1
Uncle TGF Needs YOU! (please read)(pretty please?)
2
Replies
23
Views
806
Iron1
Iron1
DLC86
The Tone Scientist (YouTube channel feed)
2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
DLC86
DLC86
Back
Top